DIAGNOSIS OF GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE IN THE CLINICAL PATHOLOGY SERVICE AT HOSPITAL II SUÁREZ ANGAMOS -ESSALUD, 2010 LIMA–PERU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35563/rmp.v1i3.107Keywords:
diabetes mellitus, test de tolerancia a la glucosa, intolerancia a la glucosaAbstract
Introduction: Diabetes mellitus type 2 has become one of the most serious sanitary problems of our time, and their proportions are already epidemic in most of the world. An increasing interest to identify individuals with high risk of diabetes exists therefore to plan prevention strategies. Objective: To determine the number of patients who perform a glucose tolerance test and present glucose intolerance. Materials and Methods: A descriptive observational study was realized, in patients, of both sexes, the test of oral tolerance to the glucose was realized to them, during year 2010atLima city. The diagnostic criteria established by the American Association Diabetes were used. The analysis of results was realized using program SPSS 18.0.Results:The average age was65 years.The majority,1335 (71.3%) was women.Of1872 patients who entered the study, the 88.5% (1657) presented glycemia altered in fasting and 215 (11.5%) normal values of glycemia.A total of 486 (26%) patient ones presented glucose intolerance. Conclusions: The number of patients with glucose intolerance is high. The institution would have to prioritize the attention of these patients so that they get in a diabetes prevention program and decrease the incidence and complications of this disease that generates a great social cost.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Luis Edgardo Figueroa Montes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright is retained by the authors, who have the right to share, copy, distribute, perform, and publicly communicate their article, or parts of it, provided that the original publication in the journal is acknowledged.
Authors may archive in the repository of their institution:
- The thesis from which the published article derives.
- The pre-print version: version prior to peer review.
- The post-print version: final version after peer review.
- The final version or final version created by the editor for publication.