Level of knowledge about Glaucoma in non-glaucomatous patients ofthe ophthalmology service of the Essalud Hospital “AugustoHernández Mendoza” in Ica-Peru, September December 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35563/rmp.v9i3.368Keywords:
Glaucoma, Nivel de conocimientos, OftalmologíaAbstract
Objective: To determine the level of knowledge about glaucoma in non-glaucoma patients of the
ophthalmology service of the EsSalud Augusto Hernández Mendoza de Ica Hospital, between the months of July and December 2018. Materials and methods: The type of research is observational, transversal, descriptive and correlational. 374 non-glaucomatous patients were surveyed using the instrument validated in Spanish on knowledge in glaucoma performed by Munayco et al. The data processing used Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS v20. Results: 374 people were included in the participation of the questionnaire, of which 61.5% were qualified with a low level of knowledge, 14.4% a medium level of
knowledge and 24.1% of respondents with a high level. When assessing the overall scores obtained in the
questionnaire, the average was 54.37 points, with minimum and maximum values of 9 and 89 points
respectively. A significant relationship was found between the level of knowledge with sex (p = 0.003), with
the degree of instruction (p = 0.001), the origin (p = 0.000) and the presence of some comorbidity (p =
0.001), age (p = 0.005) and with economic dependence (p = 0.027). Conclusions: The level of knowledge
in the population studied is low. Improving this level of knowledge could help in the early detection of the
disease.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 RAMÓN ROLANDO CÁMARA-REYES, ENRIQUE URÍA-LÓPEZ, FERNANDO MUNAYCO-GUILLEN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright is retained by the authors, who have the right to share, copy, distribute, perform, and publicly communicate their article, or parts of it, provided that the original publication in the journal is acknowledged.
Authors may archive in the repository of their institution:
- The thesis from which the published article derives.
- The pre-print version: version prior to peer review.
- The post-print version: final version after peer review.
- The final version or final version created by the editor for publication.