Self-perception of health status and self-care capacity in university nursing students.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35563/rmp.v11i3.502Keywords:
Autopercepción, Autocuidado, estudiantes de enfermeria, saludAbstract
Objective: To determine the relationship between self-perception of health status and self-care capacity in university nursing students. Material and methods: Quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive and non-experimental-correlational design, with a sample of 356 students, applying the survey technique and a structured questionnaire with personal data, SF-36 test of perceived health, and EECAC self-care capacity scale as an instrument. Results: Self-perceived health status was 82.3% fair, followed by good 17.1% and poor 0.6%; by dimensions, a good level was found in physical function 87.6%, physical role 47.2%, emotional role 42.4% and bodily pain 75%; the average level of health predominated in vitality 90.7%, mental health 89.6%, social function 86% and general health 89.9%. Self-care capacity was of medium level 59.6%, and high level in 40.4%; by dimensions health promotion and social interaction were of medium level (61% and 60.7%). According to Spearman's Rho test, the relationship between self-perception of health status and self-care capacity is significant (p=0.010), there being also relationship of health status with health promotion (p=0.001) and social interaction (p=0.006). Conclusions: There is a relationship between self-perception of health status and self-care capacity in university nursing students.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Adrian Eduardo Fuentes-Heredia, Norma Pastor-Ramirez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright is retained by the authors, who have the right to share, copy, distribute, perform, and publicly communicate their article, or parts of it, provided that the original publication in the journal is acknowledged.
Authors may archive in the repository of their institution:
- The thesis from which the published article derives.
- The pre-print version: version prior to peer review.
- The post-print version: final version after peer review.
- The final version or final version created by the editor for publication.